Research overview
What makes human judgment and action possible?
My central question
What must be in place for us to judge, act freely, and take responsibility — and how does technology change those conditions?
Having an ability does not mean we can use it. We may need reliable evidence, time to think, real alternatives, and a chance to question a decision. My research examines what happens when technology and institutions change these possibilities.
AI is one example, not the whole subject. The same questions arise in science, social life, theology, and institutions.
Explore further
The ideas behind the research
Research areas
Six connected questions
- Read more →
Area 01
Judgment & Answerability
Who can explain and defend an institutional decision?
- Read more →
Area 02
Normativity & Standing
Who counts morally — and does that tell us whose claims take priority?
- Read more →
Area 03
Formation & Agency
How does technology shape who we become and how we act?
- Read more →
Area 04
Desire & Relations
How does comparing ourselves with others shape desire, resentment, and social life?
- Read more →
Area 05
Explanation & Science
What can scientific evidence and models actually tell us?
- Read more →
Area 06
Institutions & Infrastructure
What do institutions need in order to know, decide, and act?